How brands own words


You might have seen that Specsavers has applied to trademark the word ‘should’ve’. And they’re not the first; Carlsberg managed to trademark the word ‘probably’ (and cunningly got round a ban on alcohol advertising at Euro 2016 by using just that word on billboards).

They’re both words that started off in straplines and have taken on a (carefully managed) life of their own. And they prove that your brand’s words can be what Professor Byron Sharp calls ‘distinctive assets’ , just as much as the visuals. After all, which is more Nike: the swoosh, or ‘Just do it’? They both ooze Nikeness.

The words you use in your straplines, names (not just the brand name) and, of course, your tone of voice all have the potential to be recognisable, distinctive elements of your brand. But most brands don’t think of language methodically enough, or make memorability enough of a factor in the words they choose. That’s why we spend our lives convincing new marketing directors not to ditch really well known straplines, just because their strategy has changed slightly.

So have a look at your brand. How many ‘distinctive linguistic assets’ does it have? (We know, we know: we’d like to help the Professor with his language, too.)

 


3 minutes, 23 seconds read

Posted in

Our take

By

Admin

on Sep 14, 2016

Share this article on

Make inclusive language a matter of course

The Writer’s Academy

Related articles

Enough about us

Let's talk about you

We use cookies to make our site better.

Find out more about how we use them (and why they’re called ‘cookies’) here.