iNdecipherable


There’s been much fevered blogging about Apple’s fancy new wrist-watch (or ‘wearable’ – ugh). Some people think it’s a great example of Apple’s innovative spirit. Others think it’s proof that they’ve lost their way. But most people agree it’s a masterstroke of usability design; a beautifully crafted thing that Apple have clearly obsessed over. They’ve spent years getting all the tiny details of the size, the strap and the crown (there’s a watch-word I didn’t even know until the Apple Watch turned up) just right.

It’s a shame they don’t take the same care over the details of their language.

Back in June, we pulled together a report of the longest, most difficult Ts and Cs. Its a shame we didn’t include Apple – they’d have been a contender for the top spot.

Today iTunes asked me to click to say ‘I agree that I have read these terms and conditions’ on a document that was 15,022 words long, with a Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease score of 42. That’s effectively the same length and reading difficulty as Shakespeare’s Macbeth.

How many millions of dollars did they spend designing the 21st-century watch?

How hard would it be in comparison to fix this regular dose of iGibberish?

 


3 minutes, 25 seconds read

Posted in

Our take

By

Admin

on Sep 19, 2014

Share this article on

Tried and tested training

The Writer's Academy

Related articles

Enough about us

Let's talk about you

We use cookies to make our site better.

Find out more about how we use them (and why they’re called ‘cookies’) here.